Anyone who thinks that my information about Youtube in the story below is based on a fluke, here is the welcome screen today.  You will notice that the Howard Dean video, once again, is front and center.  If you search for videos, and go to a search results page, this is what you see……………………………

Again………….there is Dean, at the top of the Director Videos, in white shirt and tie. He is displayed prominently throughout Youtube along with numerous left-wing propaganda videos.  Anyone want to continue to argue the merits of the Fairness Doctrine.  Even Youtube provides a forum for liberal thought, with little real estate left for a differing viewpoints.

 I have written about the enormous advantage the Democrats have with their ‘front-organizations’ on the web, in print and on the airwaves.  One prime example is the mega-success website;  ’Youtube.’   The video featured on almost every page, at the top of the Director Videos is a message from Dem wonderboy; Howard Dean. 

My son and I watch Youtube videos nearly every night.  He is a toddler and likes garbage truck and fire truck videos.  For several days, the Dean video has been prominently displayed in the top spot on every page we go too.  This is not coincidence.  Anyone who regularly uses Youtube will spot the incredible discrepancy in the number of pro-conservative/pro-Republican videos versus pro-liberal/pro-Democratic videos.  The libs are granted an advantage of at least 50 to 1.  The anti-Bush hatefest infects Youtube to it’s core.

Beyond Youtube, there are other mega-traffic sites who strongly favor the Democrats and act on their behalf. The site, Boing Boing, which gets amazing numbers of visitors daily includes pro-liberal, anti-conservative content whenever possible.

Anti-Christian article from Boing Boing

Anti-Bush administration piece on Boing Boing

More anti-Bush administration propaganda on Boing Boing

You may be surprised that the on-line encyclopedia, Wikipedia, is another liberal/Democratic instrument. This borders on outright deception, since many young people use Wikipedia for research on school projects. In taking a biased position, it endorses the liberal propaganda that they get in the classroom. Anyone who doubts my credibility on this topic can learn first-hand the degree which these websites operate in a political cyber-world.

An incredible mischaracterization of historical facts about President Bush on Wikipedia

Go to Wikipedia and search for any well-known conservative, search for any Republican politician or any conservative social cause. Then, do the same for Democratic politicians, well known liberals and liberal social causes. The tone of the articles, the conclusions and the listing of ‘controversies’ always favor the liberals. The conclusions always favor the liberal point of view. Even in an on-line encyclopedia, we find bias of the worst kind.

Wikipedia piece on Hillary Clinton reads like a commercial.  Presents misleading conclusions on Whitewater, Filegate, Vince Foster ’suicide’ and office records tampering, Travelgate, Lewinsky, futures trading scandal or missing Rose Law firm records.

All of these high-traffic websites work hand-in-hand with the high-traffic liberal blogoshere to convey a message of support, while indoctrinating their readers, into voting Democrat in the next presidential election.  These websites should be called out onto the carpet for their deceptive practices.  They should be exposed. 

When web surfers are viewing videos, looking up subject  matter in an encyclopedia or searching a site like Boing Boing for interesting trivia, they don’t realize that they are part of a social experiment, and they have stumbled into the roll of unwilling guinea pigs.  If it sounds like subliminal mind control, disguised propaganda and manipulation, that is exactly what it is.

You could argue that the owners, writers, producers, editors and contributors of these websites happen to be liberal and the innate nature of their viewpoints are expressed in their on-line ventures.  My research into the backgrounds of the principals of these businesses finds that to be true.  They are strongly liberal, often activists in liberal causes and big supporters of the Democratic Party.

The problem is that big business on the Internet should not engage in deceptive practices that are akin to a subliminal commercial.  If the intended net effect of their collective content is to sway their readers to liberal ideals and a vote for Democratic candidates, then they should disclose that information.   Another example of the absurdity of the ‘Fairness Doctrine.’   The great majority of cyberspace is dedicated to a liberal, Democratic message, much to the exclusion of an opposing point of view.

Just some of the hundreds of anti-Bush videos to be found throughout Youtube